Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 12, 2003No. C-3-02-226PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PERFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS OUT OF TIME (DOC. # 13); DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(5) (PORTION OF DOC. #9), IS OVERRULED; DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6) (PORTION OF DOC. # 9), IS SUSTAINED; PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE, WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM DATE, AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, CONSISTENT WITH THIS DECISION AND SUBJECT TO THE STRICTURES OF FED. R. CIV. P. 11; SHOULD PLAINTIFF ELECT NOT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN SAID TIME PERIOD, THE CAPTIONED CAUSE…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re TudorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- In Re EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Antioch Co. Litigation Trust v. Morgan (In Re Antioch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Antioch Co. Litigation Trust v. Morgan (In Re Antioch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Becker v. SinghDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.