Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Ropp

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1977No. 12221Published

1Opinion of the Court

558 P.2d 632 (1977)

98 Idaho 61

Ronald I. DUMAS and Shannon Dumas, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Mary ROPP, as widow and sole heir of Kenneth Ropp, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 12221.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

January 5, 1977.

Daniel P. Featherston, Sandpoint, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Nicholas M. Lamanna of Cooke & Lamanna, Priest River, Paul D. McCabe, Coeur d'Alene, for defendants-respondents.

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

This action was instituted by plaintiffs-appellants Ronald I. Dumas and Shannon Dumas, his wife, against Mary Ropp (widow and sole heir of Kenneth Ropp, deceased),…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Arrington Construction CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stein v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Wackerli v. MartindaleIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kester v. BostwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  5. Stokes v. Van SeventerAlaska Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API