Legal Opinion

State v. Finesmith

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 21, 2009No. DOCKET NO. A-1056-08T4PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

968 A.2d 715 (2009)

406 N.J. Super. 510

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Ross FINESMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

DOCKET NO. A-1056-08T4.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 27, 2009.

Decided April 21, 2009.

Paul B. Brickfield, River Edge, argued the cause for appellant (Brickfield & Donahue and Fox Rothschild, L.L.P., attorneys; Mr. Brickfield and Alain Leibman, Lawrenceville, of counsel and on the briefs).

Jeanne Screen, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Anne Milgram, Attorney General, attorney; Ms. Screen, of counsel and on the brief).

Befo…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. United States v. Steven L. Kaplan, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Rudolph KeszthelyiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. State v. Michael A. Maltese (073584)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  3. State v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. State v. Hai Kim NguyenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  5. State v. O'DONNELLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API