Legal Opinion
The People v. Scott Barden
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 2016No. 98PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stein, J.
On this appeal, we are asked to determine who is chargeable, for statutory speedy trial purposes, with each discrete time period within a pre-readiness adjournment when the People initially request an adjournment to a specific date, defense counsel is unavailable on that date and requests a later date, but the court is unavailable on the later date, resulting in an even longer adjournment. Further, we must decide whether defendant consented to the additional delay occasioned by the court’s calendar when, upon being advised by the court of its next available date,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. SantosNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. LiottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. RousawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. DestinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.