Legal Opinion

Coven Distributing Co. v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 16, 1952No. Gen. 45,469, 45,470PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lews

These cases involve an automatic amusement machine known as the Bally Hook Bowler, hereafter called the Bowler. The controversy arises from the refusal of the City Collector of the City of Chicago to issue automatic amusement machine licenses for the use of the Bowler on the ground that the Bowler is a modern variety of bagatelle or pigeonhole commonly known as pin games and that it violates section 193-26 of the Municipal Code which reads :

“It shall be unlawful for any person to keep or use in any place of public resort within the city any tables or implements for any game of bagatelle or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. TierneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. D. Gottlieb & Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  3. Berman v. PrendergastAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Young v. HansenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. Koziol v. Village of RosemontAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Illinois Power Co. v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  5. Moss v. WaytzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API