Legal Opinion

United States v. Francisco Mendoza-Prado, Aka, Paco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 31, 2002No. 01-10105PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Francisco Mendoza-Prado appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, of two cocaine-related offenses. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant met Donald Peralta in 1994, when Peralta was hired by the janitorial firm where Defendant worked. The two men became business and social friends while they worked together. They maintained a loose acquaintance after Defendant left his job at the janitorial firm.

In the fall of 1996, FBI Agent Mario Galindo undertook an investigation of drug trafficking in Redwood City, California. Agent Galindo knew Peralta, who had supplied him…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Luis Beltran-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Michael Charles JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Daniel J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Eduardo Sandoval-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Johnson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States v. Brian Francis JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API