Sweet v. Yamashita
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Christy K. Sweet, Case No. 2:23-cv-00886-CDS-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Wesley F. Yamashita, 9 Defendant. 10 11 Under
28 U.S.C. § 1915
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested 12 authority to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff also submitted a complaint. (ECF 13 No. 1-1). Because the Court finds that Plaintiff’s application is complete, it grants her application 14 to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court also screens Plaintiff’s complaint. 15 I. In forma pauperis application. 16 Plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.