Legal Opinion
Forbush v. NTI-CA Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 5, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00141Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL J. FORBUSH, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-00141-H-RBB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT 14 NTI-CA INC., a Nevada corporation, dba JUDGMENT NTI GROUND TRANS; JOHN E. 15 KINDT, an individual; and DOES 1 [Doc. No. 34.] 16 through 10 inclusive 17 Defendants. 18 On November 26, 2024, Plaintiff Michael J. Forbush filed a motion for default 19 judgment against Defendants NTI-CA, Inc. doing business as NTI Ground Trans (“NTI”) 20 and John E. Kindt.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.