Kehmeier v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Thomas L Kehmeier, No. CV-24-03211-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 United States of America, 13 Defendant. 14 15 “As Benjamin Franklin observed, ‘In this world nothing is certain but death and 16 taxes.’” Tilton v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co.,
376 U.S. 169, 180
(1964). Despite this ubiquitous 17 adage, Plaintiff Thomas Kehmeier claims that the United States Constitution prohibits the 18 federal government from taxing his 2023 income and that he is therefore entitled to a refund 19 of the almost $60,000 withheld by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.