Legal Opinion
Ogle v. De Sano
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 1984No. 14294PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING
This opinion supersedes our prior opinion issued October 31, 1984, which is hereby withdrawn.
SWANSTROM, Judge.
Ray and Ruth Ann Ogle brought this action against Edward A. DeSano, Jr., M.D., to recover damages for alleged medical malpractice or in the alternative for breach of an oral contract. Dr. DeSano moved for summary judgment pursuant to I.R.C.P. 56. The district court granted the motion, finding plaintiffs’ cause of action was barred by I.C. § 5-219(4). Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider the ruling was denied and they appeal. We affirm.
Four issues are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Allrid v. Emory UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MoneyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jenkins v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 1985
- Moss v. BjornsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Stuard v. JorgensonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.