Legal Opinion

Stuard v. Jorgenson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2011No. 36844PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

Respondent Dr. Samuel Jorgenson, M.D., negligently performed a spinal surgery on Appellant Patrick Stuard on July 15, 2004. Stuard’s symptoms subsided after the surgery and Dr. Jorgenson did not realize he had negligently operated at the wrong spinal level until over two years later. The parties dispute whether, for purposes of the two-year statute of limitations, the cause of action accrued at the time of the surgery or instead at the time the mistake came to light because of a second injury, when the error was discovered. Stuard appeals from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of McCall v. BuxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lapham v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hawley v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Conner v. HodgesIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Justin S. Reynolds v. Trout, Jones, Gledhill, Fuhrman, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Evans v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  4. In re BoltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2018
  5. John E. Wyman v. John J. Eck, M.D.Idaho Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API