Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 2008No. A06-2460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Appellant Michael James Martin was charged with fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance. At his first appearance, the district court set conditions of pretrial release requiring that Martin submit to a baseline urinalysis drug test in addition to random drug testing. In the alternative, the court set bail, without non-monetary conditions, of $5,000 cash or a $50,000 bond. When asked why bail in that amount was necessary, the court indicated that the amount had nothing to do with assuring that Martin made future court appearances. On appeal, the court of appeals…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. NerzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. David PowersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  2. State of Minnesota v. Quentin Laurel RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API