Legal Opinion

Carrell v. Carrell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 5, 1959No. 49720PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Whether a provision in a divorce decree providing for monthly alimony “as long as defendant [wife] remains unmarried” shows the intent of the trial count to continue such payments after the decease of the husband, is the question before us. If the intent is not clear it is not necessary for us to determine whether the court has such power under section 598.14 of the 1958 Code of Iowa.

The decedent obtained a divorce from the appellant in 1942. The decree required the decedent to pay the wife, appellant here, “the sum of $160 per month as long as defendant remains unmarried.” The decedent (Dale…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snouffer v. SnoufferOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In Re Estate of YossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Mullen v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  4. Dull v. DullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Kruckman v. KruckmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. In Re Roberts'estateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Catron v. CatronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. In Re Roberts'estateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. In Re Roberts'estateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API