Legal Opinion

Dull v. Dull

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Henry Silwold, Judge. The trial court refused to modify an allowance of alimony. Therefore, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

The alimony provision charges the defendant with supporting plaintiff and their minor child, to the extent of contributing $4.00 per week, payable semimonthly. It is" from this obligation that the appellant seeks to be relieved. It may fairly be said that he urges but one reason for the modification in question, and that is that, since the divorce, his wife has remarried. There is no substantial evidence whatever that conditions have otherwise substantially changed since the divorce was granted. It fairly appears from the record that, though the alimony provision in terms includes both the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schlarb v. SchlarbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Daniels v. DanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holesinger v. HolesingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Carrell v. CarrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Kruckman v. KruckmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Sanders v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API