Green v. Bristol-Myers Co.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Plaintiff Oceal Green (Green) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Bristol-Myers Company and Xomed Cor poration (collectively referred to as Xomed) in a product liability action. Xomed successfully moved for summary judgment on the basis it did not manufacture the allegedly defective product.
On appeal, we consider whether Code of Civil Procedure section 437c’s time limitation requiring a summary judgment motion to be heard no later than 30 days prior to the date of trial is extended when the original trial date is continued. We conclude it is. We further…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Graham v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- McCreery v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lackner v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. BravoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Soderberg v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Beverly Hospital v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. BravoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.