People v. Bravo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*731Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Defendant Martin Ariaga Bravo appeals from his conviction for burglary. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly calculated the number of presentence custody credits pursuant to Penal Code section 4019.1
The Courts of Appeal are presently in conflict on the calculation of presentence conduct credits. (Cf. In re Allen (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 310 [164 Cal.Rptr. 319]; viz. People v. Smith (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 523 [259 Cal.Rptr. 515].) We conclude the proper method of calculation is that adopted by the Smith court. This method provides that if a defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. LevittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BravoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1993