Legal Opinion

McCreery v. Eli Lilly & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1978No. Civ. 17365PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, J.

Plaintiff, Nancy J. McCreery, appeals from a summary judgment granted defendant, Eli Lilly and Company, in a product liability action. Plaintiff suffers from a benign cell disorder of the cervix described as vaginal adenosis. She alleges her condition is attributable to her mother’s use of diethylstilbestrol (DES) to prevent miscarriage during pregnancy in 1953, and inferentially, she fears that her cell disorder may become malignant.

Plaintiff now asserts liability against defendant, Eli Lilly and Company, notwithstanding her inability to identify the specific manufacturer of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API