Legal Opinion
MacK v. Alabama Department of Human Resources
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided January 17, 2002No. CIV.A. 00-D-1435-NPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court is a Motion For Summary Judgment, which jointly was filed by all Defendants 1 on November 2, 2001. (Doc. No. 27.) Plaintiff Dianne Mack (“Mack”) filed a Response to this Motion on December 10. (Doc. No. 33.) No further pleadings are under submission with respect to the present Motion. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that Defendants’ Motion is due to be granted.
I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The court exercises subject matter jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kourtney Cotton v. Cracker Barrel Old County StoreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Casciani v. NesbittDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Dejarnett v. WillisDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013