Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Warden
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 16, 1992No. 10286PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The petitioner appeals from the judgment rendered granting the respondent’s motion to quash his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.1 He claims that the court improperly rendered judgment without giving him the benefit of an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On July 19, 1989, the petitioner pleaded guilty to robbery in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136, and admitted to a violation of probation in violation of General Statutes § 53a-32, with no agreed sentence recommendation. On September 13, 1989, he was sentenced to consecutive terms of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ferryman v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Fasulo v. ArafehSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adorno v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Holcomb v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Mercer v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Santiago v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992