Legal Opinion

Adorno v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 9, 2001No. AC 20297PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The petitioner, Fermín Adorno, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly dismissed the petition because (1) counsel was ineffective at the suppression hearing (a) for failing to investigate his educational background, (b) for failing to introduce expert testimony regarding his ability to waive his Miranda1 rights and (c) for compelling him to testify; (2) counsel was ineffective at the trial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Elsey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Bowden v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Dunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API