Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mercer v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 29, 1993No. 11486Published

1DissentFreedman, J.

Where material issues of fact are in dispute, it is fundamental to our notions of due process of law that a party is entitled to the opportunity to have the trier of fact resolve those disputed factual issues after a full evidentiary proceeding. Because I believe that the allegations of the habeas petition in this case are not insufficient as a matter of law to permit the granting of the petition, I conclude that the trial court improperly denied the petitioner the opportunity to present evidence in support of his petition for habeas corpus. Accordingly, I dissent.

The petitioner alleges that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. State v. MercerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API