Pittam v. Maynard
Idaho Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant George E. Pittam filed a second amended information in the district court of the Second Judicial District on January 16, 1981, in which the appellant identified himself as a “Citizen Prosecutor.” The information alleged “[t]hat [Judge] John M. Maynard did knowingly, wilfully and in bad faith, refuse and neglect to perform the official duties of his office and collected his salary illegally for services purportedly rendered, in violation of Article 1, Section 18 and Article 5, Section 17, Idaho State Constitution.” The information then set out twelve specific alleged statutory or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Eismann v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- JI Case Company v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Interest of WellardIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of Tax AppealsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Board of County Commissioners v. WinslowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Chapple v. Madison County OfficialsIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Idaho Judicial Council v. BeckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Idaho Judicial Council v. BeckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.