Legal Opinion

Idaho Judicial Council v. Becker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1992No. 19720Published

1Opinion of the Court

834 P.2d 290 (1992)

122 Idaho 288

Inquiry Concerning: Judge Phillip M. Becker.

IDAHO JUDICIAL COUNCIL, Petitioner,

v.

Judge Phillip M. BECKER, District Judge, Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Respondent.

No. 19720.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, April 1992 Term.

April 30, 1992.

On Denial of Motion for Leave to Produce Additional Evidence and Petition for Rehearing June 11, 1992.

R. Keith Roark, Special Examiner for petitioner, of the firm of Roark, Donovan, Praggastis, Rivers & Phillips, in Hailey, argued.

Hollifield, Tolman & Bevan, Twin Falls, for respondent. William R. Hollifield argued.

JOHNSO…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. De Cloedt v. De CloedtIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Matter of JenkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Fredricksen v. LuthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Pittam v. MaynardIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Idaho Judicial Council v. BeckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API