Legal Opinion
Eismann v. Miller
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1980No. 13907PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
In this original proceeding the unopposed affidavits filed in support of petitioner’s request for injunctive relief establish the following facts:
Eismann is a private attorney practicing law in this state. Judge Towles and Judge Prather are judges of the First Judicial District. Jim Harris is the prosecuting attorney for Ada County. They have in common that each has been subjected to legal action taken by the respondent acting pro se.
Eismann represented the defendants in Miller v. The Coeur d’Alene Press, et al., Kootenai County case no. 40300, an action filed by the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Evans v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Turner v. American Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1975
- Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Daniel M. Pilla and Jerome Daly v. The American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Atkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Sweeney v. OtterIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- E & E HAULING, INC. v. Pollution Control Bd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Birdo v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- People v. LowensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.