Legal Opinion

Foundation Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1936No. 42394, M-155PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The sole question relating to the year 1918 involved in case No. 42394 is whether a jeopardy assessment of an additional tax made by the Commissioner on December 22, 1925, under section 274 (d) of the Revenue Act of 1924, was illegal and void under the facts and circumstances disclosed by the record. While the tax liability of plaintiff for this year was under consideration by the Commissioner, plaintiff executed waivers of the statute of limitation, in the last of which the time within which the Commissioner might assess any additional tax found due was extended to December…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. LaBelle Iron Works v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Couzens v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  4. Regal Shoe Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  5. Terminal Wine Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. C. Lloyd v. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal Revenue, District of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Communist Party, USA v. MoyseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Publishers New Press, Inc. v. MoyseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  4. Plitt v. HofferbertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API