Legal Opinion

Jay Kenton Long v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 15, 1989No. 88-5664PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

I

On September 20, 1983, on the eve of trial, Jay Kenton Long, the appellant, tendered, pursuant to an oral plea agreement, a conditional plea of guilty to counts two and three of a three-count indictment. Count two alleged that appellant fraudulently transported a forged gold certificate in foreign commerce; count three alleged that he fraudulently transported thirty gold certificates in foreign commerce. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314, 3237 (1982). Under the plea agreement, appellant’s plea would become unconditional and the Government would dismiss count one of the indictment, 1 if the district…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Henry Charles Cooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Willie D. Armstead v. Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. State v. CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. United States v. Bentley Washington Westcott, Also Known as Barrington Glen MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API