Stewart v. Ficken
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
This case has had a tortuous route to travel in its efforts to reach a hearing in, the Circuit Court, on its merits. This is the third appeal to this Court from orders of the Circuit Court on motions to amend the complaint by making it more definite and certain.
The Supreme Court held, on the first appeal, that the complaint stated three causes of action; one peculiar to the cor poration, one peculiar to Emma H. Stewart, and one peculiar to Stephen Elliott, trustee. The case was remanded to the Circuit Court “with leave to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stewart v. FickenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Givens v. North Augusta Electric & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- St. Charles Mercantile Co. v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Kirven v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Bank of Timmonsville v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stewart v. FickenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Floe v. PlowdenDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
- United Machine Works, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977