Legal Opinion

St. Charles Mercantile Co. v. Armour & Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 6, 1930No. 12912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Blease.

This case seems to be' on rather a new line — presenting, perhaps, some new questions — and, accordingly, it is of more than passing interest. But, as we have often found in that wonderful science of the law, new questions arising as •to rights between persons, and the remedies for wrongs upon those rights, are answered largely by applying to them old legal principles. Mr. Justice Gage often said, in his characteristic way, “The facts breed the law.” We turn, therefore, first to the facts in the case, and, because the exceptions of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reaves v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. Winthrop v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  3. Lorick v. Palmetto Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  4. National Bank v. Southern Ry.—Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Wilson v. Palmetto National Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holland v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Brown v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Christiansen v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Shaw v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. Broome v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API