United States v. Daryl Van Hawkins, United States of America v. Andre Pierre Brown
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
Andre Brown and Daryl Hawkins appeal their jury convictions of a number of cocaine related offenses. We affirm.
PROCEEDINGS BELOW
In April 1988, a grand jury returned a superseding indictment charging Brown and Hawkins with conspiracy to possess cocaine base with intent to distribute, distribution of cocaine base, and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.
On August 9, 1988, Brown and Hawkins moved to strike the term “cocaine base” from the indictment as unconstitutionally vague. The district…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Jim A. Brown, A/k/a/ Mark A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. StansellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Thomas TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. James Easter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Florida Association Of Rehabilitation Facilities, Inc. v. State Of Florida Department Of Health And Rehabilitative ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.