Legal Opinion
United States v. Stansell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 1988No. Nos. 87-3101, 87-3102PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants John Stansell and others (collectively, defendants) appeal their convictions based on violations of 40 U.S.C. §§ 318a, 318c and 41 C.F.R. § 101-20.304 (1986). We affirm.
FACTS
On August 15, 1986, defendants participated in a protest demonstration at the Jackson Federal Building in Seattle. As part of the demonstration, some of the demonstrators attempted to chain shut the doors at the Second Avenue entrance. After Federal Protective Service (FPS) officials cut and removed the chains, the demonstrators sat in front of the doorway, preventing federal employees…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Act Up!/Portland v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheri Lynn BULACAN, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Daryl Van Hawkins, United States of America v. Andre Pierre BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Baby Dolls Topless Saloons, Inc. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.