Legal Opinion
Superior Oil Co. v. Etheridge
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 9, 1951No. 4-9553PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.
The trial court awarded appellee a lien under Act 615 of 1923 (now found in § 51-701, et seq., Ark. Stats.); and appellant challenges the correctness of the said judgment.
The appellant, Superior Oil Company (hereinafter called “Superior”), was the owner of certain oil and gas leases in Ashley County, and made a “letter agreement” with Claud R. McSpadden. Superior addressed a letter to McSpadden reading in part :
‘ ‘ The Superior Oil Company agrees that, in the event of complete performance as hereinafter provided of the following conditions, it will assign to you…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guynn v. McCauleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- Arkansas State Licensing Board for General Contractors v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Roberts v. TiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Rosewater v. Schwab Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- DeLoach Mill Manufacturing Co. v. Little Rock Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Westmoreland Manganese Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
- Brooks v. McSpaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Brooks v. Superior Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Brooks v. Superior Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Comer Lbr. & Supply Co. v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.