Legal Opinion
Macula v. Lawyers Title Insurance
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 9, 2009No. 1:07-cv-01545-DCNPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONALD C. NUGENT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Gary Macula’s Motion for Class Certification. (EOF # 57). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
This lawsuit was brought by Plaintiff, Gary Macula, against Lawyers Title Insurance Company (“Lawyers Title”) on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. The Complaint alleges that Defendant, a title insurance company, knowingly and routinely charged its customers far in excess of its statutorily-mandated rates.
Plaintiff claims that Defendant is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Stout v. J.D. ByriderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Randleman v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Campbell v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Hancock v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. BurnsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Scott v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.