Legal Opinion

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Burns

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 3, 2013No. 3:05CV7393PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.

This is a securities fraud ease in which plaintiffs,1 Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (P & P) and West Virginia Laborers Pension Trust Fund (WVL), claim defendants, Michael Burns and Robert Richter, made false or misleading disclosures in financial statements related to Dana Corporation (Dana) securities and bonds.

Pending is plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (Doc. 166). For the reasons that follow, I grant plaintiffs’ motion in part, and set further proceeding in part.

Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

Background2

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Willis v. Big Lots, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  2. Plumbers & Pipefitters, National Pension Fund v. BurnsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. Bond v. Clover Health Investments, Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
  4. Crain v. Upstart Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  5. Dougherty v. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API