Legal Opinion
Hancock v. Chicago Title Insurance
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided December 9, 2009No. Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-1441-DPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Chief Judge.
The dispositive question presented by plaintiffs motion for class certification is whether she has met the predominance requirement of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3). Concluding that she has not, the court denies the motion.1 Defendant moves to implead a third-party defendant. The court grants the motion.
*385I
A
Plaintiffs Ceaser Hancock (“Hancock”) and Emma Benavides (“Benavides”) brought this putative class action on behalf of themselves and other customers of defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Chicago Title”). They allege that Chicago…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Mullen v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Frances Unger, William Patterson, Lead Gordon Ellis, Lead v. Amedisys Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ahmad v. Old Republic National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Campbell v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. John & Lucy Mims, Helen Cotton Ragland, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Hamilton v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Earl v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.