Legal Opinion
Bell v. Fur Breeders Agricultural Cooperative
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2003No. 01-4252PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from an action brought by John M. (Jack) Bell and John Robert (Bob) Bell against Fur Breeders Agricultural Cooperative and its former directors and members of the board of directors. The Bells allege that while they were members of the cooperative, Fur Breeders committed antitrust violations pursuant to Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Sherman Act), 15 U.S.C. § 1, and Section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a). The Bells contend Fur Breeders violated antitrust laws because the discounted…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Utah Gospel Mission v. Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Gregory v. Fort Bridger Rendezvous Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Plant Oil Powered Diesel Fuel Systems, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Arapahoe Surgery Center, LLC v. Cigna Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.