Legal Opinion
Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 6, 1990No. 88-346PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This is the second appeal generated in the course of protracted litigation concerning the establishment of a deliberately offensive pig farm in Stowe. The relevant facts are detailed in Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc., 149 Vt. 451, 546 A.2d 196 (1988), in which we affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the pig farm was a nuisance and upheld the court’s award of compensatory damages. Nevertheless, we reversed in part because the $380,000 punitive damages award was assessed with respect to Raymond Ramsey as well as the other defendants. We concluded that the evidence did not support an award of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- D'Arc Turcotte v. Estate of LaRoseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Sisters & Bros. Investment Group, LLPSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Rattigan v. WileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Mung Sen Tu v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.