Legal Opinion

Morlock v. Fink

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1927No. Docket No. 5553PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

The assignor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Vierhus, together with a Mrs. Tisney agreed to lend the defendant $5,000. Each was to contribute $2,500. Mrs. Tisney expressed doubt of her ability to raise her share, but the appellant claims the agreement was that the full sum of $5,000 was to be lent. Defendant agreed to give security for the loan by executing a mortgage on a certain paint factory and machinery in Alameda. The mortgage was not executed but Mrs. Vierhus advanced $2,500, and later when Mrs. Tisney proved unable to raise her share Mrs. Vierhus, upon the importunities of appellant, advanced…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Glougie v. GlougieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Fox v. MonahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Whyte v. RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Sidebottom v. SidebottomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Richards v. TavaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Lambros v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Lambros v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API