Legal Opinion

Richards v. Tavares

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1930No. Docket No. 6883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered against him on two promissory notes, one for $5,000 and the other for $1,000. The notes were executed to the Latham Square Corporation and by it assigned to the plaintiff. Defendant alleged that the notes were conditional obligations payable only in the event that certain units of the stock of the corporation were sold by him, which was not done. The same contention is made on appeal, and, further, that the trial court erroneously permitted the plaintiff to amend his complaint to conform to the proof.

The facts are as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Noland v. BullOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Williston v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. C. J. Hogan, Inc. v. Atlantic Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  3. Rabbit v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Johnson v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. M. J. Ryan Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API