Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lambros v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 2003No. B158405Published

1Dissent

MOSK, J.,

I respectfully dissent.

In August 1948, Vasillos S. Lambros (Lambros) bought a whole life insurance policy from Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife). Lambros purchased the policy from a New York company in the District of Columbia and moved to California, from which, for many years, he paid premiums to MetLife. In 1998, Lambros paid the full annual premium and *51then during the year covered by that premium exercised his right to surrender the policy and receive the cash surrender value. He also requested the return of that portion of the premium attributable to the period after…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Louisiana v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Vu v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API