Heald v. Crump
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
This is an action upon a promissory note. Both sides moved for judgment on the pleadings. The motion of plaintiff was sustained. Judgment was entered accordingly, and defendant has sued out this writ of error.
The complaint is in the usual form. It sets out the note, which is one for $500, dated February 28, 1920, and due in six months. The answer consists of three defenses. The first is not now considered by either party. The second and third defenses must be considered together as one, for the reason that the third adopts all the allegations of the second, and then does no more than add:…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Welles v. Colorado National Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Miller v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Downing v. TiptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bennett v. Coors Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Vail/Arrowhead, Inc. v. District Court for the Fifth Judicial District, Eagle CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Russell v. GTE Government Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Cooper v. Flagstaff RealtyColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.