Hartman v. Loverud
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The claim of appellants is that Mrs. Clancey created by parol a trust, of which Mr. Loverud was trustee, for the benefit of Johanna Masted and Mrs. Dearborn, and that the $4,000 trust fund must be paid over to Johanna Masted and the estate of Mrs. Dearborn.
Mr. Loverud testified that on April 7, 1930, Mrs. Clancey delivered to him a $7,500 mortgage and mortgage note, that they thereafter remained in his possession until they were fully paid, and that all but $4,000 of the avails were paid to Mrs. Clancey in part prior to her death and in part into her estate. Pie further testified that at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Miller v. ThatcherTexas Supreme Court · 1853
- Quass v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Dupont v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wesley Heat Treating Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Swazee v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Kapusta v. WeirWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Wesley Heat Treating Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958