Miller v. Thatcher
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Colorado. In this case the answer was not sworn to, the law not requiring it. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
The plaintiff in the court below, who is the appellee in this ■court, filed his petition to subject certain lands and laud certificates, conveyed by one Gardiner to Miller, the appellant, to the satisfaction and reimbursement to him of a certain sum of money paid as security to Gardiner; and he alleges that the laud and certificates so transferred were conveyed for the purpose of remunerating the said Miller and himself for money paid as security for him, the said Gardiner; that'Miller was a co-security with the petitioner for Gardiner; that although the said conveyance is on its face…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Brotherton v. WeathersbyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Moreland v. BarnhartTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Pierce v. FortTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Herndon v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Bagley v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.