Legal Opinion

Bobb v. Kraybill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1986No. 00275PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment in this defamation action. The sole issue for our determination is whether the trial court erred in finding no genuine issue of material fact as to the truthfulness of the articles published. The trial court found that appellant did not and could not contest the substantial truth of the articles and, therefore, granted appellees’ motions for summary judgment. 1 We agree with the trial court and, accordingly, affirm its order.

The record reveals that appellant was a marketing manager with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Dunlap v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Diodato v. Wells Fargo Insurance Services, USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Strain v. FerroniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. White v. WeinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Alberici v. TinariSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API