State v. Hooper
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
J. JONES, Justice.
Darren B. Hooper was convicted of lewd conduct with his daughter, six-year-old A.H. At trial, the district court deemed A.H. unavailable and admitted a videotaped interview of the child. After Hooper’s conviction, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), and Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165. L.Ed.2d 224 (2006). Hooper appealed. The Court of Appeals held that a videotaped interview of the child victim was testimonial under Crawford and Davis, that the admission of the videotape was error,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne CannonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State v. ShackelfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Katherine Lea StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.