Legal Opinion
State v. Peery
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 2010No. WD 71070PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal filed by the State of Missouri (State) pursuant to section 547.200.1, 1 appealing the Circuit Court of Randolph County’s (motion court) order sustaining Michael Peery’s (Peery) motion to suppress evidence recovered during the police’s search of his vehicle on the basis that the search violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. On appeal, the State presents one point in which it claims that the police’s search did not violate the Fourth Amendment because it fell within the Ter ry 2 stop exception to the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Gray v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. BarlowMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JUSTIN KEITH LONGMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.