Legal Opinion
Waters v. City of Roanoke Rapids
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 12, 1967No. 195PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
The basis upon which a city or town may be held liable for damages to a pedestrian injured by a fall while walking upon its sidewalk is thus stated by Parker, J., now C.J., speaking for the Court in Smith v. Hickory, 252 N.C. 316, 113 S.E. 2d 557:
“The governing authorities of a town or city have the duty imposed upon them by law of exercising ordinary care to maintain its streets and sidewalks in a condition reasonably safe for those who use them in a proper manner. Liability arises only for a negligent breach of duty, and for this reason it is necessary for a complaining party to show more…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Fitzgerald v. Concord.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Houston v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matternes v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Gower v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Rogers v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Rockett v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Cook v. County of BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.