Legal Opinion

Rockett v. City of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1969No. 6928SC403PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHedhicK, J.

The principles of law regarding the liability of a municipality for failing to keep its streets and sidewalks in a safe condition were set out by Parker, J., now C.J., in Smith v. Hickory, 252 N.C. 316, 113 S.E. 2d 557 (1960), as follows:

“The governing authorities of a town or city have the duty imposed upon them by law of exercising ordinary care to maintain its streets and sidewalks in a condition reasonably safe for those who use them in a proper manner. Liability arises only for a negligent breach of duty, and for this reason it is necessary for a complaining party to show more than the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Fitzgerald v. Concord.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Dunnevant v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Houston v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. Tri-Arc Food Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Dunbar v. City of LumbertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Webb v. North Carolina Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Branham v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Crouse v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API