Legal Opinion
Rockett v. City of Asheville
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 19, 1969No. 6928SC403PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHedhicK, J.
The principles of law regarding the liability of a municipality for failing to keep its streets and sidewalks in a safe condition were set out by Parker, J., now C.J., in Smith v. Hickory, 252 N.C. 316, 113 S.E. 2d 557 (1960), as follows:
“The governing authorities of a town or city have the duty imposed upon them by law of exercising ordinary care to maintain its streets and sidewalks in a condition reasonably safe for those who use them in a proper manner. Liability arises only for a negligent breach of duty, and for this reason it is necessary for a complaining party to show more than the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Fitzgerald v. Concord.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Dunnevant v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Houston v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blackmon v. Tri-Arc Food Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Dunbar v. City of LumbertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Webb v. North Carolina Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Branham v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Crouse v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.