Legal Opinion

Gower v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1967No. 545PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff’s evidence establishes that the plaintiff fell at the time and place stated in the complaint and sustained serious injury as the result of her fall. This is not sufficient to impose liability upon the city. It is not liable to every pedestrian who falls and sustains an injury by reason of an inequality in the level of or a defect in its sidewalk, curb or street. The city is not liable for such injury unless it was negligent in failing to correct the defect within a reasonable time after it knew, or should have known, that it existed and was a hazard to persons using the street…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Waters v. City of Roanoke RapidsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morris v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Cockrell v. Cromartie Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Desmond v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. McClellan v. City of ConcordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Rogers v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API