Legal Opinion
Coleman v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 24, 1913PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is an action to recover the value of goods. The material facts are that in July, 1909, the plaintiff agreed to purchase from the Lake Shore Rubber Works fifty-five bales of scrap packing weighing forty-four hundred pounds, the invoice price being two and one half cents per pound. The packing was shipped by the Lake Shore Rubber Works, consignor, from .Erie, Pennsylvania, to William C. Coleman Company,* consignee, Boston, Massachusetts. A bill of lading was issued by the initial carrier and sent by the consignor to the plaintiff. The consignment reached Boston on July 12, and. the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bernard v. Adams Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Rosenbush v. BernheimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Brewer Lumber Co. v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- McKahan v. American Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hoffman v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Donahue v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Pester Refining Co. v. MAPCO Gas Products, Inc. (In Re Pester Refining Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1986
- Smith v. the FerncliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Calnan v. Guaranty Security Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.