Frisch v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
JOHNSON, Judge.
This appeal is before a special term panel on Daniel Peter Frisch’s motion for a stay of his appeal and a remand to the district court so that he may file a postcon-viction petition. Because Frisch previously petitioned for postconviction relief, and now is appealing the denial of that petition, the remand he seeks is for the purpose of filing a second postconviction petition. We conclude that the rule on which he relies does not permit a stay of a postconviction appeal for the purpose of filing a second postconviction appeal, and we deny the motion.
Frisch…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.