Legal Opinion

Frisch v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 2013No. A13-1121Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

JOHNSON, Judge.

This appeal is before a special term panel on Daniel Peter Frisch’s motion for a stay of his appeal and a remand to the district court so that he may file a postcon-viction petition. Because Frisch previously petitioned for postconviction relief, and now is appealing the denial of that petition, the remand he seeks is for the purpose of filing a second postconviction petition. We conclude that the rule on which he relies does not permit a stay of a postconviction appeal for the purpose of filing a second postconviction appeal, and we deny the motion.

Frisch…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API